Search Archives

line.jpg

line.jpg

line.jpg

Powered by Squarespace
Login
« 93. Viktor Koen's Toyphabet. | Main | 91. The Good. The Bad. And the Ugly. »
Thursday
Mar292007

92. Ad of the Week. I think.

I have walked past this board everyday for the past three weeks. And because I'm an ad/design nerd, I've asked myself several questions: Do I like it only because it features a skull? Do I not like it because the designer didn't use the Economist font (a proprietary, Erik Spiekermann designed font family, I believe. Originally called Ecotype but now something like "The official Economist, you only wish you could buy it Font Family?") I think the Economist font would look more spine-like, though I recognize that it's easier to set a monospaced font vertically. Back to my questions: do I like it because it continues the economist tradition of very clean, quick (and red) communication? Do I not like it because it betrays that witty copy-driven tradition by going all vector-art on us? (Though they've gone visual many times before. View what is possibly my favorite ad of all time here.) Do I like it because of the clever way of using the magazine's masthead as the logo? Do I not like it because this also bucks their usual logotype sign-off? Do I like the headline or do I think it's a cliche? (The economist ads always walk a fine line between pun and clever word-play; most often on the good side.) Do I like it because it's almost impossible to ignore due to it's size and location? Do I not like it because someone felt the need to over-explain what they do with 'Insights on the world, weekly' which is only vaguely related to the 'having an opinion' thing? Ultimately, after three weeks, I think I have decided that I don't really like it � mainly because it could easily have been better. That's always frustrating to see. Or maybe I like it.

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (3)

it's interesting that the comment under this link states "I wonder how they can get away with not even mentioning their name." yet, the economist name is exceptionally placed about 3/4 of the way down the brain in the middle, the ONLY place you can make out the masthead of the mag in the entire brain...
April 27, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjulied
i know - a lot of people miss it. But I think economist readers don't, and I'm glad they didn't dumb it down by putting it on the bottom right corner. Sooooo nice.
April 27, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJJ
AND it's even sweeter for the club that does get it ;)
April 27, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjulied

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.